Public debate is a powerful form of democratic practice that can help us explore the limits of tolerance, mutual respect and understanding. It can expose our own prejudices, challenge assumptions that lead to inequality and misunderstanding and help us develop more persuasive arguments for change. However, debate can also be exploited for nefarious purposes – such as inciting violence or propaganda – so it’s important for debate organizers and participants to reflect carefully on the nature and balance of reasons why they are engaging in public debate activities.
Designed to be accessible, debate focuses on current events and uses logical reasoning and persuasive delivery to promote discussion and societal engagement. For example, a debate on the topic of whether we should invest in a basic income might involve two teams one supporting the resolution and one opposing it. Debaters learn to articulate their positions and research evidence to support them – this helps develop critical thinking, communication proficiency and social awareness.
The key to success in public debate is clear, well-structured argumentation backed up by strong evidence. This requires a commitment to researching and developing complex arguments that are both compelling and accurate. In addition debaters must develop a skill in effectively navigating the arguments of their opponents and identifying fallacious reasoning. Debate also requires an ability to engage the audience and respond to attacks on their arguments.
Whether in practice or competition, the best debaters are able to pivot and counter no matter which direction the debate goes. They practice for contingencies by creating branch charts that highlight where a debate COULD go and preparing arguments they can use to counter these directions.